Search for: All records

Abstract Feathers are complex structures exhibiting structural/functional disparity across species and plumage. Flight was lost in >30 extant lineages from ~79.58 Ma–15 Ka. Effects of flight loss on senses, neuroanatomy, and skeletomusculature are known. To study how flightlessness affects feathers, we measured 11 feather metrics across the plumage of 30 flightless taxa and their phylogenetically closest volant taxa, with broader sampling of primaries across all orders of crown birds. Our sample includes 27 independent flight losses, representing nearly half of extant flightless species. Feather asymmetry measured by barb angle differences between trailing and leading vanes decreases in flightless lineages, most prominently in flight feathers and weakest in contour feathers. Greatest changes in feather anatomy occur in older flightless lineages (penguins, ratites). Comparative methods show that many microscopic feather traits are not dramatically modified after flightlessness compared to body mass increase and relative wing and tail fan reduction. Changes involved with greater vane symmetry show stronger shifts, however. Relaxing selection for flight does not rapidly modify feather flight adaptations, apart from asymmetry. Developmental constraints and relaxed selection for novel feather morphologies may explain some observed changes. Macroscopic changes to flight apparati (skeletomusculature, airfoil size) are more evident in recently flightless taxa and could more reliably detect flightlessness in fossils, with increased feather symmetry as a potential microscopic signal. We observed apical modification in later stages of feather development (asymmetric displacement of barb loci), while morphologies arising during early developmental stages are only altered after millions of years of flightlessness. 

espite reports of sexual dimorphism in extinct taxa, such claims in non-avian dinosaurs have been rare over the last decade and have often been criticized. Since dimorphism is widespread in sexually reproducing organisms today, under-reporting in the literature might suggest either methodological shortcomings or that this diverse group exhibited highly unusual reproductive biology. Univariate significance testing, especially for bimodality, is ineffective and prone to false negatives. Species recognition and mutual sexual selection hypotheses, therefore, may not be required to explain supposed absence of sexual dimorphism across the grade (a type II error). Instead, multiple lines of evidence support sexual selection and variation of structures consistent with secondary sexual characteristics, strongly suggesting sexual dimorphism in non-avian dinosaurs. We propose a framework for studying sexual dimorphism in fossils, focusing on likely secondary sexual traits and testing against all alternate hypotheses for variation in them using multiple lines of evidence. We use effect size statistics appropriate for low sample sizes, rather than significance testing, to analyse potential divergence of growth curves in traits and constrain estimates for dimorphism magnitude. In many cases, estimates of sexual variation can be reasonably accurate, and further developments in methods to improve sex assignments and account for intrasexual variation (e.g. mixture modelling) will improve accuracy. It is better to compare estimates for the magnitude of and support for dimorphism between datasets than to dichotomously reject or fail to reject monomorphism in a single species, enabling the study of sexual selection across phylogenies and time. We defend our approach with simulated and empirical data, including dinosaur data, showing that even simple approaches can yield fairly accurate estimates of sexual variation in many cases, allowing for comparison of species with high and low support for sexual variation.